<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Palatkwapi &#187; Mata Ortiz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.palatkwapi.com/tag/mata-ortiz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.palatkwapi.com</link>
	<description>1400 - 1540 among the southern pueblos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Enigma of Mata Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.palatkwapi.com/2005/11/the-enigma-of-mata-ortiz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatkwapi.com/2005/11/the-enigma-of-mata-ortiz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mata Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pueblo Pottery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatkwapi.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all let me say that I have the utmost respect for Juan Quezada and the rest of my fellow traditional potters down in Mata Ortiz. What really baffles me is the sheer amount of public interest in their work as compared to that of the Pueblo Indians (yes Indians, Native American is so 1990s). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all let me say that I have the utmost respect for Juan Quezada and the rest of my fellow traditional potters down in Mata Ortiz. What really baffles me is the sheer amount of public interest in their work as compared to that of the Pueblo Indians<span id="more-46"></span> (yes Indians, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_name_controversy" target="_blank">Native American</a> is so 1990s). It seems like every time I turn around there&#8217;s another Mata Ortiz exhibition or demonstration, everywhere I go I see their pots for sale, at the library I can find easily as many resources on Mata Ortiz pottery as Pueblo Pottery. If you Google it you will over find twice as many results for &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hs=3N6&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=%22Mata+Ortiz+Pottery%22&amp;btnG=Search" target="_blank">Mata Ortiz Pottery</a>&#8221; than for &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hs=fjl&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=%22acoma+Pottery%22&amp;btnG=Search" target="_blank">Acoma Pottery</a>&#8221; or &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hs=s8Q&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=%22hopi+pottery%22&amp;btnG=Search" target="_blank">Hopi Pottery</a>&#8220;!  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t begrudge them their success, and I definitely have to hand it to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_MacCallum" target="_blank">Spencer MacCallum</a> and whoever else is responsible for marketing them. I just don&#8217;t understand how they can be more famous or popular than Acoma or Hopi pottery, it just doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatkwapi.com/2005/11/the-enigma-of-mata-ortiz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEFINING &#8220;TRADITIONAL&#8221; SOUTHWEST POTTERY</title>
		<link>http://www.palatkwapi.com/2004/10/defining-traditional-southwest-pottery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.palatkwapi.com/2004/10/defining-traditional-southwest-pottery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 00:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mata Ortiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pueblo Pottery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.palatkwapi.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been reading The Many Faces of Mata Ortiz, (a very good book that I would highly recommend) and at the same time working on several new pots. Which has got me thinking about what is traditional southwestern pottery and where it crosses the line and just becomes pottery.  
Traditional southwest pottery is obviously pottery that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1887896082/qid=1098453243/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/103-5022174-6344651?v=glance&amp;s=books" target="_blank">The Many Faces of Mata Ortiz</a>, (a very good book that I would highly recommend) and at the same time working on several new pots. Which has got me thinking about what is traditional southwestern pottery and where it crosses the line and just becomes pottery.  <span id="more-49"></span></p>
<p>Traditional southwest pottery is obviously pottery that is inspired in some sense by the prehistoric cultures that flourished here centuries ago, and therefore would include similar construction techniques and design elements. In my opinion part of the beauty of southwestern pottery is that it is made entirely from local materials, it is wholly a product of the land it represents. The construction of southwest pottery has always been hand made using various methods (paddle and anvil, coil and scrape or even pinch pots) but never thrown on a wheel, slipcast or any other method not used by the ancients. The final distinguishing characteristic is the design on the pots surface, allowing for a wide range of artistic expression, the design is always based, however loosely, on those of the potters who went before us.  </p>
<p>This is how I would describe traditional southwestern pottery, there are many fine potters working in the southwest making beautiful pieces using other techniques and I don&#8217;t mean to take anything away from them. There are potters out there however who are not making pottery in the traditional ways but are marketing it as such, this is dishonest and not fair to unsuspecting and uninformed consumers who think they are getting the real deal.  </p>
<p>In this book I have been reading, it talks about some potters in Mata Ortiz using &#8220;commercial clays&#8221; and even toner cartridges in the making of vessels, and many of the designs are, in my opinion, moving too far away from the Casas Grandes tradition. Not that there is anything wrong with that per se, just that these should not be marketed as traditional southwest pottery, such wares belong in the store next to the fine Oaxacan pottery, not in the Indian arts stores. I believe the same is true of the Acoma potters who sell slipcast pottery or any other artist who will break with tradition in the name of sales or artistic expression, there needs to be some integrity involved here.  </p>
<p>I should be firing a few vessels this weekend if the weather doesn&#8217;t get in the way, hopefully I will be able to post some pictures here next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.palatkwapi.com/2004/10/defining-traditional-southwest-pottery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
